Golden Knights Have Been “Aces” Thus Far In The NHL Final, They Rout Florida (7-2) In #2 To Lead (2-0)

Once on I guess you can call it a “blind date,” “she” greeted me with you are “aces” except for your hair.

I “harken” back to that long ago, no longer the case time, not quite back to the ancient days of the word “harken” to cite the Golden Knights tremendous play, winning (5-2) and then (7-2) to lead the Florida Panthers (now (0-6) in final round play) (2-0) in the NHL Final, which resumes Thursday in South Florida, where on an unprecedented 4 straight nights (Wednesday June 7th-Saturday June 10th) an NHL or NBA final round game will be played.

Aces, I cite, as the WNBA Las Vegas Aces are the defending champions and are even $ to repeat, (the New York Liberty, given top players are 8 to 5 or so). More down the road on near 95 to 1 and conceivable 383 to 1 parlays had the Aces who were down significantly this past Sunday at the Indiana Fever, not pulled the game out.

I cite (and will not fight) that Jonathan Marchessault, one of 7 Golden Knights on the first year team that were 5’d in the final by the Washington Capitals, “opened” and had a 2 goals/1 assist night.

Adin Hill continued his fine play in goal for L.V.

Back to the parlay talk and a “plug,” I suppose for a “convenience store” follows.

This was the 35th time in 55 Stanley Cup Final rounds starting in ’68 with expansion that a team took a (2-0) series lead. That is 7/11 and Sunday past the Chi Sky (rhyme) barked at 7 to 1, “outrighting” the Liberty meaning if 11 to 1 “dog” Indiana (Fever) had held off the Aces, that 7/11 parlay (parlays are still sucker bets and the books thrive more because of them than anything else) would have paid 95 to 1.

Throw in the Heat at 3 to 1, who as I wrote here in half baked fashion, I thought would help the network and league by squaring their final round series vs Denver (Nuggets) and that parlay would have paid 383 to 1.

Alas if the queen had ,,,, ….. but Heat/Sky did pay 31 to 1. I do not take parlays but realizing the just cited, sort of rooted vs my 4/44 Indiana bet and not that I “controlled” the result, realize that was/is foolish.

Big Advice: If you do not gamble, please do not start!!